Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hello Dennis,

Le 19.01.2013 23:27, Dennis Roczek a écrit :
Am 19.01.2013 20:56, schrieb Paolo Debortoli:
Il 19/01/2013 19:54, Dennis Roczek ha scritto:
Hello mailinglist!
this is my first here, so bear with me if I'm doing something wrong. I was writing with Florian Effenberger and he wanted me to post here my
idea.

I'm rather active at the English Wikipedia and they have there a so
called 'Bounty Board'. [1]

On that wikipage everybody is able to post his wish which article should
be improved to a certain
quality level or that an article is created for a reward. The rewards
look different. The most chosed rewards are:

* a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation (which is the foundation behind
Wikipedia),
* a 'donation' to the improver,
* an improvement to any other article (often bounded to a genre).

it's nice, yes.  some people have been talking until now about some
ideas proposed such as a libreoffice 'brainstorming'  or  'easy
hack'    (done on website or on google pages or facebbok), such as
done by AOO or the ubuntu community. Many things are feasible; maybe
the main problem is finding a number of people interested in.

I think this system would also work for LibreOffice. I know that at
least some users would pay money if a particular bug is resolved or any
wished improvements are made.

it's possible, yes, but I am not sure. for sure it would increase
partecipation. rewards could be made in different ways (eg a prize for
the most voted or innovative improvements).  another possible option
could be something like (involving universities) giving students
prizes for dissertations or thesis one the topics needed by the
foundation (marketing subjects or technical solutions).

That sounds also very interesting. The Wikimedia Foundation has their
hands in many universities and is helping some students to get their
thesis working. (e.g. with special rights like the researcher right to
increase the API limit from 50 to 500) I guess setting up a page with
tasks and a contact person similar to the Google of Summer Code is
easily achieved - although for that kind of stuff a simple Wiki page is
enough.

I see the need and I understand that there are limited resources, but I still think that a easy and handy formular and overview page would some
newly / potential developers get into the project simply because they
want to earn some additional money.

Thanks for your email and your idea. Indeed, we should be working on such a system, although at first it would be purely web based to start with a simple process to start the idea. Now, I may perhaps reduce the question to one particular aspect, but I'm wondering what this would entail in terms of the financial process. - several bugs or features get selected, voted on and one of them emerged. - this feature or bug has to be somewhat estimated (perhaps by our Engineering Steering Committee) in terms of effort, and therefore in terms of reward. - then somebody or a team picks up the task and works on it until completion
- if properly achieved it gets the reward.

Is that what you had in mind? (Back to the 4.0 release preparations for me now...)

Best,

Charles.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.