Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Sophie,

First off, thanks for your comments, much appreciated.

Le 2013-01-14 16:33, Sophie Gautier a écrit :
Hi all,
On 14/01/2013 21:46, Marc Paré wrote:
[...]

The FR team is more than welcome to start their (our) own blog and
marketing team. Nothing has ever stopped us from doing it. Other nl
groups are doing it. But in the meantime, if you read the thread from
Florian, there are plans coming.
Sorry to jump here, I'm not a marketer, but I would like to express some
ideas:
Marc, let me disagree here, it's not about the FR project but about a
general way the NL project are seen and the resources that are
offered/provided/requested to/by them. I lose 60% of my audience by
having my blog removed (that doesn't encourage me to go on of course)
but that means also that there is, inside our project, a
misunderstanding or a misconception about language representation and
their impact on the overall communication on the marketing side.

Taking care of our international EN site is another matter, it speaks
for the project and does not necessarily follow the schedule of other
parts of the project.

No, if we don't think to the overall community we are going to lose, or
pass by a lot of people, there is no difference between i18n and
NLprojects and one doesn't speak for another (or tell me what is
happening currently in the Russian project just for example).
That's a long time I said that if we settle a tool, whatever the usage,
it should be available for the overall community, and not only for the
common denominator. We should be equal to all and provide the same
resources for all. Otherwise, it's very discouraging for the isolated
efforts and it needs to double them at any time to only hope to be
visible and more important: to be effective. I know how it's easier to
say that we act for what might be the broader audience, but we deal with
people for people and they have a lot to say if we let them have a
chance to say it. And whatever the language, it's much better than silence.

In fact we are both saying the same thing, however, I believe it's the process by which to represent the blogs where differ.

We have all agreed to the Project's communication medium as being that of the language of international-EN. So, in this context, we need to make sure that the project should be well served by the tools it uses to make sure that we provide it to the outside world as our international community voice. This, so far is working with a patchwork of different software solutions.

That leaves us then to take care of our language communities, which for now are not well served. This needs to be corrected, which, judging by Florian's notes, assures us that this is forthcoming for both our international-EN and nl blogs. If you are talking of putting all languages into one large blog of multiple nl posts, there are better ways to show our communities' vibrancy than by throwing them altogether into the salad bowl and expecting people to pick out the bits that they recognize. I for one, do not find it compelling to have to wade through many posts of many languages to read something in my language of the progress/news of my own community.

As you know, most recently, this was discussed on the FR and the website lists and we looked at a particular model that may bring us closer to this -- Planet OpenSouse (for those unfamiliar with these 2 threads, you have to read through the complete posts to get the complete arguments --> [1][2][3]). This, to me, would be a good solution to our blogging communities -- however, the only critique I would have of this setup is that I would prefer to see our blog readers land on our TDF/LibreOffice international-EN blog first and then have our readers go on by choice to the nl blogs they prefer. No particular language group would be left out as they would not appear as an option unless they asked to be included on the group of blogs. If then, the EN community did not decide to have their own blog on the list of blogs, then so be it, but at least the EN community would have an opportunity to blog for themselves.

Then, this will put us all (nl groups) on the same footing and on the same level of importance.

Additionally, if we were to adopt the Planet OpenSouse model, I would also have the blog nl names listed in their own language.


Cheers,

Marc

[1] http://go.mail-archive.com/8Q765YJSIND_nbS9-w1683ecPh0=
[2] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.website/9376
[3] http://planet.opensuse.org/global/



Kind regards
Sophie



--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.