Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


+1

Not because i don't like or don't trust them but just because it would be a 
bottle-neck and be more demanding than rewarding for them.  They are an 
excellent resource  and people would be wise to make use of their skills and 
talents.  However, it's not always going to be possible for people to act wisely 
fast enough.
Regards from
Tom :)




________________________________
From: drew <drew@baseanswers.com>
To: marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Mon, 25 April, 2011 10:23:52
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Third Party Logs wiki page

Hi,

I should expand on that - I would like the design team to be a resource
for the different groups/teams that will be working on specific items. I
would also expect it to continue generating guidelines, recommendations
or published best practices if you will. 

I would not be in favor it acting as a mandated certification body.

Hopefully that is a bit more explanatory as to my thinking.

Thanks again for all the work you putting in,

Drew
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.