Hi Italo
Thanks for organising this evening's meeting. It was good to put faces to some of the names I see
on the mailing list. I hope these will become regular events. Some very good points were raised...
DONATIONS
I was interested in Mike Saunders' point that a lot of donations are raised from the download page
on the website. This suggests to me that these donations are from individuals installing the
software for their own use - whether that be personal or related to their work or business.
Where LibreOffice is being rolled out across an organisation, it is likely that it is only
downloaded once with the installation files then being re-used or copied multiple times. The
message on the website proposing a donation will hardly be seen by anybody in that organisation.
There was a suggestion to display a dialog on first use in which the case for making a donation
could be made. I would support this. It means that every user would see it. Of course in an
organisation it is unlikely that many users would make a donation themselves, but there would at
least be the chance that the question is raised by some more technically aware users.
MARKETING
Over the last 4 or 5 years, Mike has sent me 3 batches of flyers and other promotional material for
me to distribute. I have indeed left copies, with permission, in business parks, high schools, the
local university campus, libraries, the town hall and various other places with a large potential
audience. There is no way of knowing whether my efforts have resulted in a large numbers of new
users at least trying LO, or whether it has been a complete waste of time.
If we were to have a "first use" dialog, prompting for donations, then we could also ask the user
about the source of their decision to install LO e.g flyers, magazine or website article,
recommendation from a friend or colleague, organisational policy, etc, etc.
USER INTERFACE
Most fashions are cyclic. Nobody ever complained about the Word 97 UI being "old fashioned". Its
hierarchical menu system was both logical and intuitive. It has often been said that Microsoft only
introduced the ribbon menu system in order to create something radically different to what had gone
before - not because it is inherently better or easier to use (which I don't believe it is). It is
surely significant that few applications other than office suites have gone down this route. We are
lucky that LO enables switching between a "ribbon" interface and "classic" interface. It is
entirely possible that at some point we may see a gradual transition back towards a hierarchical
menu system in Office 365, even if it manifests itself somewhat differently. For that reason I
would caution against abandoning the classic menu option for the sake of "modernity".
OPPORTUNITIES
Sully made a very interesting point which confirmed something I had long believed to be true.
Administrative accountability in the USA extends to a far lower level than in most of Europe. As a
result the rejection of a particular product or policy in one city does not necessarily tie the
hands of administrations in neighbouring cities. Compare that against most European countries where
a decision at the top level has enormous influence over all subordinate levels. As a consequence
there must be vastly more scope for the adoption of LO in parts of the public sector in the USA
than elsewhere. While that creates great opportunities, it also presents a great challenge in terms
of documenting current policies and presenting LO to public authorities across the entire country.
Of course a decision and the implementation of that decision can be very different things. The UK
government decided in 2014 that open document formats would become the new public sector standard.
Almost a decade later, working at times closely with government agencies, I have yet to see or
receive one single document in an open format. I've little doubt that such a rate of change is not
uncommon elsewhere. We need to be aware that a top level decision to standardise on LibreOffice in
government use could similarly take years to come to fruition - and that is without the intense
lobbying by the likes of Microsoft to reverse the policy, such as happened in the Munich city
administration some years ago.
All the best
Nige
LibreOffice - Free and open source office suite: LibreOffice Website<https://www.libreoffice.org>
Respects your privacy, and gives you back control over your data
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
- [libreoffice-marketing] Reflections On Today's Meeting · nigelverity -AT- hotmail.com
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.