Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Official/Community pamphlet types proposals

Hi :)
It is possible to stop the underlinings and blue links.  I do it by brute force just by 
reformatting the links to force them out of having underlinings.  I could do a more elegant way by 
changing the settings in 
Tools - Options - Appearance
but that might mess up other things for me so i don't.  Besides it gives me a chance to say brute 
force as though i had some muscle.  
Regards from 
Tom :)  







> ________________________________
> From: Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com>
> To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org 
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013, 16:12
> Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Official/Community pamphlet types proposals
>
>
> Le 08/05/13 10:42 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster a écrit :
>
> > I tend to use the PDF version to do most of my printing. I create the
> > documents and then make a PDF version that can be printed on any system,
> > with or without LO installed.
> >
> > So if you make a PDF version with "clickable" options, make sure they
> > can be printed without any problems.
> >
> > As I stated earlier, most professional places prefer PDF files for their
> > printing, when they do low count prints.  I tend to print the brochures
> > myself, but sometimes it is worth the extra costs from a printing
> > service, since they can use a machine to do the folding.  Every fold 150
> > brochures at one time?  I did andfor heavy stock paper it is worth the
> > cost for the machine folding.
> >
> > Also, some printing services would charge more for the "official"
> > brochure than the "community" brochure, due to the large block of ink on
> > the "front" panel.
>
> Hmm, how about it we labelled it in such a way as to make it clear to 
> people that the .pdf version was an electronic version specifically 
> optimized for electronic posting and not for printing? We could list the 
> reasons why it is not preferable to use this version for printing ... 
> underlined links throughout the brochure which would make for an ugly print!
>
> We can then advise that anyone wishing to print any of the 
> print-optimized version to take care of this on their own. At least this 
> will allow the people printing the .odf version to have a little more 
> control over the .pdf version for their print jobs.
>
> Do you think this would be OK?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
> -- 
> Marc Paré
> Marc@MarcPare.com
> http://www.parEntreprise.com
> parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
> parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted