On 02/01/2013, at 1:15, Immanuel Giulea <giulea.immanuel@gmail.com> wrote:
If not for the differences in licences, why should end-users choose LO over
AOO when migrating away from MSO? How is LO a "better product"?
One reason to choose LO over AOO is that we have (at this time) more user documentation, including
in book form for those who like books. :-)
I tell people that the program they "should" choose depends on how they use an office suite; that
is, what they want to use it for. For most people, IMO, there is no real difference between LO and
AOO at this time. In some cases, LO has features that AOO doesn't have. (I don't know if AOO has
features that are not in LO.) If those features matter to the person, then that's a reason to
choose LO.
BTW, in the past few months, several people have contacted me asking for help to solve some problem
they were having with AOO. I've said I no longer use it; I use LO, and I don't have their problem
in LO. They then try LO and say it works for them too. :-)
--Jean
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.