Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 14/12/2012 04:04 ??, Jay Lozier wrote:
Hi,

I saw this article about Corel Office
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/window-on-windows/review-the-new-corel-office/7017?tag=nl.e101&s_cid=e101

Basically the reviewer gave a so-so review and note in the last line
that LO may be a better value than Corel Office.

Hi everybody,
well, the link worked out well for me.
Thank you Jay for passing over to us this piece of article about Corel's
new Office suite.
However, the line to which you are referring to ("LO may be a better
value than Corel Office"), can't really be taken as a "praise" to LO,
given that the writer's full phrase was:
" If you are looking for an office suite that _/*will fit well with more
basic needs*/_, LibreOffice
<http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/window-on-windows/review-the-new-corel-office/10%20big%20improvements%20in%20LibreOffice%203.5>
might be the better bet.",
which throws a rather different light ...

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.