[libreoffice-marketing] Re: Libo discussion group on LinkedIn

Hi Tom,

Could you add this comment on the discuss list where I moved this post? 
I think there will be more people there with expertise on this than on 
our marketing list.

Cheers,

Marc

Le 2012-07-28 18:21, Tom Davies a écrit :
> Hi :)
> Surely programming a macro is less likely to suffer from user-error or user-distraction.
>
> Andrew Pitonyak's guide is linked to from
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications#Programmers
>
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
> --- On Sat, 28/7/12, Marc Paré<marc@marcpare.com>  wrote:
>
> From: Marc Paré<marc@marcpare.com>
> Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Libo discussion group on LinkedIn
> To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
> Cc: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Date: Saturday, 28 July, 2012, 22:30
>
> Hi Kostas,
>
> This would be more appropriate on the "discuss" list. I am sending it to
> that list for discussion, and, if it needs it, someone will file a bug
> for it. I think it would be better to be more specific with the
> description of the problem(s) before adding it to a bug list; the
> complaint is just too general.
>
> You could perhaps suggest, to whoever is finding the macro recorder
> challenging to use, to joinour discuss list and to join the discussion
> here where we concentrate on improving the product.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
> Le 2012-07-28 14:11, Kostas Mousafiris a écrit :
> > Hi everyone!
> > I intercepted the following winging about some LibreOffice feature., in
> > a LinkedIn discussion group
> > I am not sure if this is the appropriate list
> > and I also think that it may well be a known issue,
> > but I would like to report it all the same, in the hope that something
> > can be done:
> >
> > >        LO macro recorder.
> > >
> > > In LibreOffice, the macro recorder is even worse than in OpenOffice.
> > > Compared with Ms Office, OO's one it is a little hell for "simple
> > > users", but LO's is just impossible.
> > >
> > > As a trainer, I had to face my disappointed trainee's after their
> > > company has changed from OO to LO.
> > >
> > > Does anyone has an experience or comment about that?
> > >
> > > 22 days ago
> > > ✔ Jan V.
> > > <http://www.linkedin.com/groups?viewMemberFeed=&gid=3718834&memberID=126096217&goback=%2Egde_3718834_member_131211305>
> > > likes this
> > >
> > > 1 comment
> > >
> > > ✔ Jan V.
> > > <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=126096217&goback=%2Egde_3718834_member_131211305>
> > >
> > >
> > > ✔ Jan
> > >
> > > ✔ Jan V.
> > > <http://www.linkedin.com/groups?viewMemberFeed=&gid=3718834&memberID=126096217>
> > > • I do fully agree - I've been using OO since version 1.0. And have
> > > former been developing in MSO 95,97 and 2000. The Experience of the
> > > API in MSO was a mixture of frustration over incompatibility between
> > > versions and a clear picture of the object model. I think that the
> > > OOo/LO API lacks clarity and the Macro is even worse. "ooo macro
> > > programming by andrew pitonyak" gives, I think, the best
> > > dokumentation. :o)


--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted