Ubuntu LTS lasts for 3 years (for desktops) but are released every 2 years.
This gives orgs the 1 year of testing they need before migrating from the previous LTS and moving
to the new one. If they gave 3 years support and released every 3 years then orgs would have a 1
year gap running an unsupported LTS while they were still testing the new one. Now i understand
why the 1 year overlap is so important to Ubuntu.
--- On Tue, 5/6/12, Marc Paré<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: Marc Paré<email@example.com>
Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Of "business ready use" and bugs in LibreOffice and a
Date: Tuesday, 5 June, 2012, 21:23
Le 2012-06-05 09:12, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Thank you for bringing that up, it's an interesting discussion. Here's
what I think reading your message. You're asking in fact two questions.
One of which might already have been answered by a few of our corporate
* LTS obviously means long term support. Both "support" and "long term"
deserve careful consideration. I will in this email first focus on
the term "support". If we speak of support, we must think of a
support provider. In this case, does this mean we should think -as
TDF, as a project- of providing professional support to users
(obviously for a fee)? I don't think it's your idea, but I thought I
would highlight the implications of such a matter.
* Have we studied what some of the existing support/service providers
on LibreOffice already offer? I am not so sure but I'm under the
impression that you can order support (and in this case a "LTS" kind
of support) from Suse and Canonical (there are others) on one
specific version of LibreOffice. That is, these vendors have one
reference version of LibreOffice, say the 3.4.5, and they provide
support and services on it making it their de facto LTS version.
Yes, this is fine as they will guarantee that LibreNormal Ubuntu releases are supported for 18
months. Previous Ubuntu LTS
(Long Term Support) releases are supported for 3 years on the desktop
and 5 years on the server. Starting with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, LTS releases
will be supported for 5 years on both the desktop and the server. Office will work on their systems and they will
take care of any dependencies and network-ability. But I don't think they would undertake any code revision and code
features into their LTS versions, not unless they have a large team of coders, which in this case would make them
"competitors" to our work/product (read "fork"). This would take us back to the days of the many
different versions of OOo -- the same situation that drew all of these different groups into one LibreOffice community.
Leaving support/service providers to develop an LTS version, in my opinion, is not the right
strategy to adopt.
Back to your suggestion: do you mean we should relabel the older branch
"LTS", knowing that each of our releases in one branch really works
like a "service pack"? If we had the ability to provide incremental
updates (we will one day) we would have the feelings we have two
versions, and sometimes "maintenance updates". So at some point, say
the 3.5.4, we label it LTS, because we're close to open a new branch,
the 3.6, and we can suggest service providers to base their support
offers on this one for the time being. Did I get you right?
No. I suggest that at some point, the TDF/LibreOffice should designate an LTS version for
large/small organizations/businesses. These would have developers oversee the fixing of bugs for a
fixed term (let's say a 3 year period) after which time another LTS version would be designated.
The LTS maintenance would NOT introduce any new functions to the distro but only service bug
correction. IMO, if any business entity would like to add any new functionality, then this is where
a support/service provider would step in and, hopefully, contribute any development of code back to
I don't really think this is a new concept as even Mozilla-Firefox offers its own "Extended Support
Release (ESR)" version for corporate users. When critical software packages are installed in large
corporations, a lot of energy in investment of time, training and documentation is expended in order to get
employees up to speed. LibreOffice certainly falls into this category (critical software -- wordprocessing
software). While Firefox ESR is being released initially for a period of approximately 1 year, IMO, I believe
they will ultimately find that a longer term will be necessary for these large organizations. As for a
version of LibreOffice LTS (or ESR), the impact of change for large organizations is even larger due to the
amount of training of staff of new features (even more so in the educational field with the training of
If we are looking to supplant MSO in the office place, we need to realize and accept the simple fact that the
amount of software/network testing as well as (and even more importantly) the training of staff for large
orgainizations is considerable. I sincerely doubt that a "one year"-term LTS for LibreOffice would
suffice; one year is just about enough time to test out the suite before it is even installed; most
organizations simply do not have the manpower to move any quicker.
If we wish to compete in the large business market place we need to plan and develop more
strategically with our releases. Developing an LTS version will fix this. Otherwise, the choice
will remain MSO for office use, where MSO has a longer term of support with incremental changes for
bugfixes and where LibreOffice will remain marginalized as an office suite.
-- Charles-H. Schulz Co-founder& Director, The Document Foundation,
Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany Rechtsfähige Stiftung des
bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details:
http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint Mobile Number: +33 (0)6 98 65
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted