Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Marc,

Marc Paré wrote (10-04-12 19:51)

We are not talking of a button change or any changes to the page other
than making a slight change to the wording on the page to help users
decide on their download version. Leaving the default to the latest
version is no problem.

Ah yes, as I wrote this morning (or was it yesterday evening ...) I'm perfectly fine to look at improving the wording there.

I've to wait for Christian or Erich first I guess, to find out how it works.

It is an artificial distinction to talk about 'stable' and 'in
development' here.
For the non stable we have the pre-releases and the dailies.

Those terms were only used for this discussion and not suggested for the
wording change.

OK, sorry that I picked up a wrong idea. However of course I do not agree so much to use that terms in our discussion. It seems a real misunderstanding that 3.5.1 of 3.5.2 is not as good as 3.4.5 or 3.4.6. Of course there are specific bugs that annoy certain processes. Therefore have the page about the release policy, explaining how it works, and what is wise.


 - Cor

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.