Le 2011-01-02 16:46, Sadiq S a écrit :
My problem is another beast entirely. I am a highschool student and so of
course are my peers.
I know of only friend who uses OpenOffice, and this is because she doesn't
like paying for MS Office suite and the hassle of pirating it. Not because
it's free software.
How do I go around explaining how LibreOffice is better?
This is quite simple: most of the OpenOffice communities have moved to
the LibreOffice suite; we now number around 90 LibreOffice developers
many of whom were with OpenOffice; LibreOffice is what would have been
the natural outgrowth of OpenOffice as a foundation but for reasons of
trademarked name (Oracle would not relinquish the name to The Document
Foundation), LibreOffice was borne; the number of enhancements will
arrive quicker with LibreOffice rather than the OpenOffice model; she
can participate in a community where her voice does make a difference;
LibreOffice is a community product and we all share responsibility in
its quality and finally, it is just a better product.
Unfortunately, the situation with the dialysis provider is something that is
very similar to the situation here at the TDSB. I assume that Microsoft has
given some sort of deal to the TDSB to keep using MS Office. They recently
updated to XP, which I see as a renewal of the contract.
In Ontario, all school boards use Microsoft products many of which are
priced as cost per seat. When contracts are negotiated, the IT
departments do as much as possible to reduce the amount of cost per seat
(that is the cost of software for every computer) in their board. This
is their mandate. IT department will do this if this means renewing
licences for Windows on every seat to lower the MSO suite cost per seat.
I find that IT departments will adopt alternatives when these are easily
implemented over their networks (many of these use Novel). If the
network installation is not easily accomplished and maintained then they
will keep the structure that has a proven track record. TCO (total cost
of ownership) is high up on their list of concerns.
To gain a foothold in school boards, LibreOffice will have to make sure
that it will be easily network installable and maintained. It will also
have to prove having a robust file interoperability especially for MSO
file formats. We are not at the point where opensource file formats are
the norm in N. America. Once a school board in a province has moved to
LibreOffice in one of its provincially run schoolboards, many will
follow suit. Getting a foothold in one schoolboard will be the one that
will start the domino effect. After this point, the migration to
LibreOffice will be unstoppable.
My point being, we have to fight the market entrenchment and make
LibreOffice better than any other office suite.
Let's not forget that the source code that LibreOffice uses is that of
(essentially OpenOffice) and that many more code corrections and
enhancements have been made. OpenOffice does have a good track record,
LibreOffice at this point just happens to have better code and 10 years
worth of experience under a different name. :-)
staticsafe on Freenode
http://staticsafe.me | http://asininetech.com
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-marketing] "selling points" · Tom Davies
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Our goals? (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy