Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


The only reason I suggested this is because there are some who still
believe LibO and OO will become one again and I don't want that to
harm the project. But I do agree, if Oracle wants to keep OO, they
can, the strings have in fact, been cut and LibO will continue on  its
own path.

the link I included was a report that Oracle has decided not to become
involved with TDF.


-fe

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> wrote:
Le 2010-10-18 12:15, Frank Esposito a écrit :

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Oracle-wishes-LibreOffice-the-best-but-won-t-directly-cooperate-1102095.html


My personal feelings are that we should only announce if Oracle has decided
to join the masses with the LibO movement. Other than that, we should not be
involved in publicity citing Oracle who may have decided otherwise. The
strings have been cut, Oracle has been invited to join the project and we
are still waiting to see if it wants to joing. BTW ... nothing wrong in my
mind if Oracle were to join LibO and develop OpenOffice at the same time.

Marc


--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.