On 03/03/2016 06:18, Luc Castermans wrote:
But instead of reporting you could fix it, that is what open source is about.
The type of error that Elcico found is not uncommon in technical
documentation.
By reporting it, instead of just silently fixing it, people working on
either the same document, or a later version of it, in their target
language, are notified and can correct the error.
Whether or not it is cost effective to go back to the 3.x documentation,
to fix it, a slightly different question.
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.