Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 03/04/2011 09:40 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
...
I'd expect the LO Team to correct this situation.

I'd expect you to contact Sasha and try to resolve this situation inside
your team(s) first. Have you at least tried contacting him before
scolding us?

Best regards, and don't take my harsh tone too personally. It's only as
harsh as your own message.

Hail, hail, the justice is served. Back to the issues.

By now, I already see what are the options, but I still want to say that *usually* the overall coordination of the subordinated activities is the responsibility of the subordinating organisation. In our case, it's obvious that the team producing the material doesn't have to "chase around" looking to advertise itself in the infrastructure which is, frankly, far from being well documented. The LO team (or Core team, if you please) requested and received the material, so it's quite natural for the producer to expect being registered "automatically". At least, it was so in OpenOffice.org process.

By the way, yes, we are all human etc. (e.g., I wouldn't consider my "tone" as "harsh", just as "baffled").

-Yury

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.