Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On 2011-03-04 09:36, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
Let's not talk about who's to blame, but about how to correct the situation, instead.

Incidentally, by "LO Team" I was meaning the core team or however this is called. Obviously, those folks bear more responsibility than "just the translators".

So, I'm seeing the following issues right now:

1) Is there a gracious way to "demote" Sasha and put me as the "BE team leader" (or however this "position" is called)? Also, to revive Mikalai Udodau wiki contribution?

2) I'm not familiar with the Pootle process. Is there a possibility to veto the Pootle contribution, preferrably in part? Sasha's terminology differs from what's in the translation already (see my previous post).
If Sasha had suggest rights and you have review rights then you would be able to review all of Sasha's contributions.

2.1) Is there a possibility to convert the Pootle contribution to the .PO format, preferrably selectively? I.e., to convert Sasha's contribution to .PO for me to revise?
Not in PO, a limitation of the PO format. But if you download an XLIFF version for offline translation then Sasha's suggestions would be listed as alternative translations. You can use Virtaal to edit these offline XLIFF files.

3) The .PO technological cycle isn't documented comprehensively on LO sites.

-Yury



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.