Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:22 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
2010.12.08. 12:01 keltezéssel, Petr Mladek írta:
Hi,

Kohei nominated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32209 as a
LibO blocker bug. It would need to translate one more string?

Would you consider it as a blocker?
Should I add it to the lo-build.pot file?
How long would it block the release until we get translations?

My opinion is that we should update the .pot file and the pootle server
to allow active l10n team to have it fixed. Though, we should not block
the release because of this.


This is not the first time.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31817 also introduced a
string change 3 days ago and I updated the .pot file.

IMHO it is not a blocker, many translations are still in progress
anyway. And if this string was untranslated, it would not be a regression.

Yup, I agree with Andras.  Not a blocker but worth doing for 3.3.

BTW, I just pushed the change to the 3.3 branch with Caolan's sign-off.

Kohei

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.