Re: [libreoffice-l10n] is <item type="keycode"/> a valid xml tag?

Hi *,

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure
<jbfaure@libreoffice.org> wrote:
> in the string jKbn9 in
> https://translations.documentfoundation.org/fr/libo_help/translate/scalc/guide.po#unit=108741441
> there is a tag <item type="keycode"/>, if I keep this tag Pootle detects
> a "valid xml" error and if I remove it it detects an "xml tag" error
> which means, if I am not wrong, that my translation does not have the
> same xml tags as the reference string.
>
> I guess this tag is erroneous, am I right?

Yes. It is pointless to have that tag without value.It is like having
<strong/> in text.

> At least this tag could be a
> closing tag but there isn't any corresponding opening tag.

No. It is a tlag that closes itself. like <br/> it is contraption of
<br></br> for empty tag it should only appear as self-closing, so
<br></br> is considered bad and <br/> is the only valid one.

Self-closing/empty tags only make sense where the info is provided in
attributes, like <image src="/path/to/file"/> for example.

So empty item tag is pointless and wrong.

ciao
Christian

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted