2015-05-11 21:39 GMT+02:00 Christian Lohmaier
Hi Sérgio, *,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Sérgio Marques <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Can you please explain me if we (PT team) don´t work on master, will strings
translated in 5.0 branch land on master afterwards or not?
There is no server-side migration of 5.0 strings to master.
If you decide not to work on master, you'll have to sync files for 5.1
with local tools or on special request. There won't be automatic
merges back to master.
I suppose it means that master is the preferred way - and that's
really different from what was promised in discussion about master:
"→ for those languages who chose not to make use of master, shortly
before the branch-off of 4-5 the translations of 4-4 will be copied to
master (override current master translation) and updated against
Could you please give us clear information what workflow should be
followed if we want/don't want use master? Maybe the wiki page 
should be updated accordingly...
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy