Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi all,

2015-05-11 21:39 GMT+02:00 Christian Lohmaier
Hi Sérgio, *,

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Sérgio Marques <> wrote:

Can you please explain me if we (PT team) don´t work on master, will strings
translated in 5.0 branch land on master afterwards or not?

There is no server-side migration of 5.0 strings to master.

If you decide not to work on master, you'll have to sync files for 5.1
with local tools or on special request. There won't be automatic
merges back to master.

I suppose it means that master is the preferred way - and that's
really different from what was promised in discussion about master:

"→ for those languages who chose not to make use of master, shortly
before the branch-off of 4-5 the translations of 4-4 will be copied to
master (override current master translation) and updated against
templates." [1]

Could you please give us clear information what workflow should be
followed if we want/don't want use master? Maybe the wiki page [2]
should be updated accordingly...

Best regards,


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.