Hi Tom, *,
Am 30.09.2013 10:47 schrieb "Tom Davies" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
Ok, so that doesn't have much to do with whether a spell-checker would
work but surely all a spell-checker requires is
1. the spell-checker engine itself.
That is a given. LO uses hunspell itself, but integrates also with other
engines like for example the Mac Os X one.
2. That the language has a font and can be displayed on-screen
That is not a requirement for the spell checker, only one for the human in
front of the screen.
3. a dictionary
Exactly. And there it depends strongly on the structure of the language how
complex that dictionary has to be.
Dictionaries can be created as they are really just lists of words
Well, they could be list of words, but this is inefficient. In reality they
consist of patterns and rules to modify those patterns/stems.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy