Tom Davies píše v St 20. 02. 2013 v 19:08 +0000:
Hi :) I liked the announcement so please don't stop doing them! Even
though i didn't understand it this time i will have a better
understanding of it next time.
ok, will continue in sending them :-)
Now i have another question though! If you know something specific has
had no new strings between 1 branch and the next could it be brought
forwards to the new branch en-masse in the same way? Even if it was
incomplete last time?
Within a branch makes a LOT of sense and it's a huge relief to hear
that is being done already! :)
I am not sure if I understand it correctly. Do you suggest that if you
translated a string in the 4.0 branch, it should add the same
translation to the 3.6 branch and vice versa?
Such thing would make sense. I am not sure if pootle do this
automatically or if Andras does some hackery when synchronizing pootle
and git sources.
Best Regards,
Petr
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.