Hi Peter, *,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Peter V. Saveliev <peet@redhat.com> wrote:
On 10.01.2012 14:08, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
<skip />
So LO has the same "support" for it as OOo/Apache OOo has.
Has it? Excuse my ignorance, I thought that LO is forked from OOo and share
not every feature. Ok, I'm to check it in the repo.
The overlap between OOo and LO is very big - and as it shares a common
history, the stuff that was added before the split is available in LO
as well.
See e.g.
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/s?hist=91226&project=core
(search for commits that refer the bug 91226 in the commit)
But of course since the changes are >2years old, it might be that they
need some adaption - but this is the case anyway, be it OOo, LO or
Apache OOo
ciao
Christian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.