Þann fim 6.jan 2011 14:55, skrifaði Andre Schnabel:
<snip>
So - for our current workflow (where unfortunately sdf will stay for
a while, as "internal" file format) it does not really matter if you
use po or xliff - it's more or less a matter of taste.
I'd prefere xliff. given the fact, that we process the files with
translate toolkit in our build environment anyway, it should be easy
to leave the joice to the language team and have the build enviroment
work with either xliff or po.
Just curious; if the software would be adapted to use .mo files
(compiled from .po) instead of .sdf, would there be speed issues ?
It's quite nice when translating software UI to generate .mo's from the
.po's and dumping them into the LC_MESSAGES folder, restart application
and you see your changes right away.
regards,
Sveinn í Felli
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] LO Pootle · Sveinn í Felli
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.