Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,
On 12/12/2010 20:50, Valter Mura wrote:
In data domenica 12 dicembre 2010 18:47:12, Andras Timar ha scritto:

- First, we'd need some time more for translations. We finished the work
but my opinion is that the latest call for translation was too much
sudden and close to the end date.

- Second, why is the readme file merged with the other file? Is there a
reason? Shouldn't be better different files for different purposes?

Hi Valter,

RC2 was scheduled to next week, the readme issue was discovered too
late. I agree that this is unfortunate and should not repeat. Thanks for
your efforts.

New readme strings was merged into lo-build-* files, because from the
technical point of view this was the reasonable way to do it. However,
this is only temporary for LibreOffice 3.3, we'll get rid of lo-build-*
files soon.


Thanks Andras for the very quick response and clarification :-)

+1 and thanks to all for you commitment given the so short delays and lack of real process. It's great to have you all on board :) I hope we will soon be able to work on a complete and easy process for every one.

Kind regards
Sophie

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.