Hi:
As I can see in the logo, the six number is lopsided respect the rest of the logo ( Cubes ).
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
Hi:
As I can see in the logo, the six number is lopsided respect the rest of the logo ( Cubes ).
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
Since nobody was happy with the first proposal, or came forward with a
better alternative/revision, here is a second draft:
Dave
Dave,
could you please upload also a pdf, to check the output, because on macOS
the new odg still has a non-uniformly stretched "LibreOffice" logo text.
Thanks, m.
I created a version of the new file with a uniformly scaled logo: https://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/getting-started/draft-lo-6.0/cover-proposal-for-gs6-0-fixed-logo-proportions/view
I left the symbol alone as it seemed to be scaled OK already.
I took the logo from this file and saved it to its own SVG and imported to Dave's ODG: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOffice-Initial-Artwork-Logo.svg
Regards,
Ilmari
Martin,
Here is a pdf created from Ilmari's fix odg:
http://tasit.net/files/LO6_GS_Guide_Covers_DCB_20170916-logofix.pdf
Regards
Dave
Hi all,
starting with Dave's odg I made my own proposal [1] based on the cover for Libo 5 docu.
Dave's proposal seems to break some branding rules [2]:
- The "LibreOffice" text in the logo must be lined at the bottom with the Document symbol.
- no other text in the logo
- "Dont' change the spacing of the elements"
I personnally don't like the green background in the new logo and even would not repeat it at the bottom as a fat bar.
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:K-j/Drafts/Design/Front-Guide#Version_1
[2] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Guidelines_and_Best_Practices
Hi all,
Hi K-J, Good to see another proposal.
starting with Dave's odg I made my own proposal [1] based on the cover
for Libo 5 docu.
I don't know how the strange squared application icons got into the GS5
cover, but I propose we stick to the official icons from the LO6 dev
start center:
http://www.tasit.net/files/LO6_App_Icons.png
Dave's proposal seems to break some branding rules [2]:
True! The original brief was to generate something along the lines of
the new LO6 branding (See Oliver's initial post starting this thread.).
I was trying to conform with background color the official LO6 splash
intro.png image authorized by Heiko Tietze.
http://www.tasit.net/files/intro.png
- The "LibreOffice" text in the logo must be lined at the bottom with
the Document symbol.
- no other text in the logo
Not strictly true, but I am fine with whatever arrangement is chosen.
- "Dont' change the spacing of the elements"
Spacing was taken directly from the official LO6 branding artwork
authorized by Heiko Tietze.
I personnally don't like the green background in the new logo and even
would not repeat it at the bottom as a fat bar.
Agree100%. I would like to stick with the same header and footer
background colors used for previous guide covers.
[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:K-j/Drafts/Design/Front-Guide#Version_1[2]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Guidelines_and_Best_Practices
I had started work on creating new background watermark cubes, but the
results were pretty awful. If we must have cubes, I suggest we go with
the ones in your proposal.
I will raise all matters relating to the covers at next Wednesday's docs
meeting, in the hope that we can reach a final agreement/decision.
Dave
K-J,
Would you please you make the original odg (svg if you must) file of
your proposal available.
Dave
Hi Dave,
Would you please you make the original odg (svg if you must) file of
your proposal available.
It is already on wiki (""Here is the odg"):
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:K-j/Drafts/Design/Front-Guide#Version_1
And here is the direct link:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Cover_601-k-j1.odg
Hi K-J,
Don't know how I missed it previously.
Many Thanks,
Dave
Hi all:
I want to say again that haven't sense to make a great 6 in the logo that cover almost all the cubes
Regards,
Jorge Rodríguez
Hello Dave,
I found your proposal on the ODFAuthors site and like it very much. I want to make some minor adjustments, but when trying to save it on my hard disk, I get following error: Error while saving the document LO6_GS_Guide_Covers_DCB_20170921: No access to object. I rename it according the ODFAuthors conventions.
Is there anything I can do to solve it, or do you have to give access and upload a new version?
Many thanks
Best regards
Leo Moons
LibreOffice/nl
Hi Leo,
If you are logged into ODF Authors, there's no obvious reason why you
should not be able to download and open the file, because it is just a
normal Draw "odg" file.
I have sent a copy to you in a separate email.
Best Regards
Dave
Hej Dave,
Could you please provide also the original files for the icons of the various modules, as the ones for Base and Math are not 100% consistent with the others.
Many thanks
Best regards
Leo
Hi Leo,
The original icons are in the file I sent you.
All the icons used for the different modules were cloned from the SVG
file here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOffice_icons_256.png
Direct link here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/d/d4/LibreOffice_Initial_Icons-pre_final.svg
Best Regards
Dave
Hello,
I made some minor changes to Dave's proposal, which you will on the ODFAuthors site: https://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/getting-started/draft-lo-6.0/proposed-covers-for-gs6.0/cover-from-dave-with-small-changes/view
Best regards
Leo
Hi Dave,
Hi all,
Hi K-J, Good to see another proposal.
starting with Dave's odg I made my own proposal [1] based on the cover
for Libo 5 docu.I don't know how the strange squared application icons got into the GS5
cover, but I propose we stick to the official icons from the LO6 dev
start center:
http://www.tasit.net/files/LO6_App_Icons.png
The "strange" squared application icons are taken from the Breeze icon set (new in LibO 5). They are official icons, too.
It was a decision of the visual identity part of the desgin team last time to use it for the cover. And all around voted for a +1.The same icon set was used in LibO-cenference presentation template in Brno.
Hi Dave,
the document symbol in LO6_GS_Guide_Covers_DCB_20170921.odg [1] is wrong [2].
The "LibreOffice Documentation Team" text is jumping between front and back. (Printing in a pdf and scrolling it.)
[1] https://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/getting-started/draft-lo-6.0/proposed-covers-for-gs6.0/final-cover-proposal-for-gs6.0/at_download/file
[2] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Logo_resources_for_official_representation
Hi K-J,
Hi Dave,
the document symbol in LO6_GS_Guide_Covers_DCB_20170921.odg [1] is
wrong [2].
Wrong? In what way?
The "LibreOffice Documentation Team" text is jumping between front and
back. (Printing in a pdf and scrolling it.)
I have tried, but cannot replicate your issue under Linux or Windows.
[1]
https://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/getting-started/draft-lo-6.0/proposed-covers-for-gs6.0/final-cover-proposal-for-gs6.0/at_download/file
[2]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Logo_resources_for_official_representation
Dave
Hi K-J,
At least under Windows the Daily Alpha build [1] the Start Center module
icons are not Breeze. The screen capture [1] is taken from a virgin
installation (ie. no previous install or existing profile) on a Win 7
box that has never had LO (any version) installed.
So it was chosen as something to be used at Brno, that does not make it
official in any way. After Oracle gave away the OOo identity, we worked
hard to establish a LO identity (logos, icons, colors, etc.) and making
changes, just for the sake of change, does nothing to help retain the
identity we now have.
</Opinion> The Breeze icon set is very ugly and although this is the
(modern?) yuppy Windows 2 block look, I would not wish to see this
inflicted upon our users without offering them a clear choice at the
time of installation. <Opinion/>
In any case the Documentation Team is free to use whichever form of the
official icon sets they wish.
Dave