[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirements

Hi Jeremy, all :-)

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 13:27, Jeremy Cartwright <vardomescro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Upon reviewing Jean's sage advice, our current in-house setup and the
> current modus operandi, I would like to recommend we retool our usage
> of the site. I would like to point out that every time we upload a file
> with the same name, the files meant for the general public are
> changed. This doesn't seem acceptable to me, so I propose we have two
> files, one available to the public, and one tagged EDIT or some such.
> Anyhoo...

I considered having two sets of files, but decided that it was
cumbersome and non-optimal. Personally, until we figure out a better,
more permanent workflow, my proposal would be that we just keep one
file set, and that users just get the latest version on the wiki...
it's "quick and dirty", I know, but, IMHO, it's a good interim
solution that users get our currently-best offering of content... What
do you think?

> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Development Is where I
> am located here. As Ron took care of all the rebranding, let's rename
> that column to `drafts'. In that column we place a link to our EDIT
> tagged file. We rename the next column `feedback'. This gets an
> additional state of `back'. `No'== no second person has seen it.
> `Back'== a second person has seen it, but has edits and `Yes'== a
> second person has seen it and it's ready to progress to the next step.
> The third column is renamed to `proofing' and follows the same logic as
> `feedback'. When it's state is `Yes' though, it is signed off in the
> fourth column, `publish'. This means it's ready to have the EDIT tag
> removed. We would need to add a 5th column for sign out.
> I propose this to be our interim workflow until we get the `Getting
> Started' guide out the door for launch.

Seems reasonable to me. If no-one has any better proposals than the
above, Jeremy, may I suggest that you please write this up briefly in
a relevant page of our wiki, and make the necessary changes? I'm
working on the site and don't have time or focus right now...
(otherwise, if you don't have time, I can do it ASAP - just after
Christmas, maybe)

Once we get this roughly into shape, I will post back with
suggestions, get you guys' reactions, and then reorganize/move pages
around into a clean, logically-named tree structure (when I finish
with the site, and if someone has not beaten me to it).

David Nelson

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirementsJeremy Cartwright <vardomescro@gmail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirementsHal Parker <halparker42@gmail.com>
[libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirementsJean Hollis Weber <jeanweber@gmail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirementsDavid Nelson <commerce@traduction.biz>
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Workflow requirementsJeremy Cartwright <vardomescro@gmail.com>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.