[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts
- From: Sophie Gautier <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:24:32 +0200
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Michele Zarri <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 27 October 2010 14:45, Nino Novak <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Just downloaded Chapter 1, Introducing LibreOffice, from the wiki,
>> The links in the URLs seem to have been forgotten to migrate: though
>> they are labeled http://LibreOffice (which indicates they have been not
>> converted properly, presumably because the replacement oo.o -> LibO was
>> not done case sensitive) the underlying links are still pointing to
>> openoffice.org sites.
>> So if somebody continues to migrate documents, be careful to take care
>> also of the links :-)
>> BTW, where is the ToDo-List for such little tasks?
>> How about starting to use the bug tracker?
>> Any experiences?
>> E-mail to email@example.com for instructions on how to unsubscribe
>> List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/
>> All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
> Hello Nino,
> Once OOoAuthors have completed their current project of updating all
> the existing user guides to OOo3.2.1, to which I am contributing, it
> is my intention to dedicate more time to libreoffice.org
Great and thanks :)
> The idea of using a bug tracker is great.
> Maybe not needed for the problem you identified (these mistakes are
> generally corrected during the revision process) but to create new
> "features" requests or enhancements as LibO moves from version 3.3 to
> future releases and new functionality is made available.
> Unfortunately I have no experience in this area (besides filing bugs)
> but it would help to have a documentation category in the bug tracker.
> This never happened with OOo because the OOoAuthors produced user
> guides are not an organic part of the project and setting up a
> bugzilla for the documentation only is a bit of an overkill.
> I think this is one of the most attractive aspects of LibO compared to
> OOo (in the documentation area): the chance for the documentation
> besides the online help to be a rightful and integrated part of the
Yes and the online help will need also the input of the documentation
project I think. I would really like to see a way to make it more
available to authors and easier to maintain out of the product, even
if the translation workflow stays a part of the product.
Founding member of The Document Foundation
E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|[libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts||Nino Novak <email@example.com>|
|Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts||Michele Zarri <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts
- Next by Date: [libreoffice-documentation] Need of a documentation framework for LibreOffice?
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] wrong links in LibO GS1-drafts