<span style="font-size:10pt;"><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;">I have a tendency to edit most everything I read at least subconsciously. </p><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;">In part, I also wanted to make sure that the objective is to produce a better document rather than to mollify egos. In part, I wanted to demonstrate my legitimacy as a writer editor. Is there configuration management to control the day-to-day changes?</p><p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;"> </p><dev3_jjy>T-Mobile. America's First Nationwide 4G Network.</dev3_jjy><br><br>------ Original message ------<br><b>From: </b>Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk><br><b>Date: </b>09/13/2013 03:27<br><b>To: </b>Jean Weber;Don Welty;<br><b>Cc: </b>documentation@global.libreoffice.org;<br><b>Subject:</b>Re: [libreoffice-documentation] chapter 1<br><br><pre>Hi
I agree with most of that except
1. Most non-mathematicians seem to mean xor when they say "or". So for most people "A or B" excludes "A and B" happening a the same time.
2. without spaces on both side of "/" it makes things a little cramped and difficult to read. Also does;
Technical writers’/power users’
mean
writers’/power
so that writers and power are interchangeable there or should
"Technical writers"
be put in speech marks or something to keep the 2 words together and similarly with "Power users"? I think it might be best to swap out the / and replace with an "or" or an "and/or"
However, one of the advantages with wiki-editing is that
1. People are free to re-edit later
2. you can experiment and if it looks right then keep it, there is even a "preview" option that can help with experimentation
3. people can look at the history to see changes and see how things are developing
So, i think just "go for it". All your ideas have merit and almost all are things i either agree with or don't mind either way. So it's almost always an improvement imo. As Jean says, go for it
Regards from
Tom