Here is the short version of my considered opinion on the topic of
whether the Docs team should change to using Alfresco for the
production and delivery of user documentation or continue with what
we're using now (ODFAuthors + wiki).
My conclusion: at this time it is not worth making the change from
what we're doing now, although some refinement of our workflow and
file naming practices is necessary and worth doing.
Summary of reasons:
Firstly, we are discussing at least two separate needs:
* Production - what works best for the Docs team
* Delivery - what works best for the consumers (users)
In neither case do I see a clear advantage of Alfresco over our
current setup (ODFAuthors + wiki).
Production: Alfresco has some features that could convey advantages,
but ONLY IF the Docs team use those features consistently and
correctly. Based on past experience, I can't see that happening.
Worse, learning to use those features could well act as a further
barrier to participation. Any time people need to learn a bunch of new
tools to do a bit of volunteer work, many of them are likely to either
do it wrong or badly, do it not at all, or decide it's all too hard
and quit. (This is quite apart from the related discussion on workflow
and file naming.)
Delivery: Even IF the interested and knowledgable people take the time
to set up Alfresco and get it integrated with other TDF/LO services, I
can't see any real advantage to consumers in looking up docs on
media.LO.org vs the wiki and downloading them from either site. Note
that I don't see disadvantages either.
I would still like to hear from other team members who have not yet
expressed an opinion.
Regards, Jean
Team Leader, LibreOffice Documentation