Two thoughts about the copyright page for the LO Base Guide:
1) The OOo version of the existing chapters has not been published,
and I understand that Dan Lewis is writing the LO version and OOo
version in parallel. Therefore IMO the copyright page does not need
the Acknowledgements section stating "This chapter is based upon..."
with the list of contributors to the OOo chapter; all of those
contributors should instead be listed in the Contributors section of
both books and the Acks section removed.
2) As this book is unpublished, IMO it is a "new" document and could
be licensed under Apache and CC-BY-SA as I suggested in a previous
note... as long as all contributors agree. I believe we can contact
all of those contributors to get their agreement, if they don't spot
this note and speak up on this list.
What do others think? Dan, am I correct in item 1 about you writing
the two books in parallel?
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- [libreoffice-documentation] Base Guide copyright and contributors · Jean Weber
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy