Alfresco Workflow Questions

Documents are edited, reviewed, proofed, and proofed again.

So what am I supposed to do in the 'review' or 'proof' stage? Fix things myself? I think that serious content problems would get a 'comment' and sent back to drafts; likewise something that needs discussion.

But typos, small formatting nits, and punctuation? Easier to fix than to explain! Do I make such changes with change-tracking turned on and let the next proofer vet it?

Hi, :slight_smile:

But typos, small formatting nits, and punctuation?  Easier to fix than to explain!  Do I make such changes with change-tracking turned on and let the next proofer vet it?

My 2 cents is that this sounds like the wisest choice.

David Nelson

Hi :slight_smile:

Yes, fix things yourself is the main plan. No need to discuss anything
beforehand really, except perhaps whatever you consider to be serious changes.
It might be easier to make even serious changes as you go and then mention those
changes to the list. What is serious and what is not is "a moving target" at
the moment but you will get a good feel for what people are comfortable with
fairly soon so don't worry :slight_smile:

I think if you are proof-reading and complete a page then you publish it? I
think that even after publishing people can still correct it and re-publish?

Regards from
Tom :slight_smile: