On 1/30/2011 10:04 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
My 2 cents would be that comments inside documents are more
immediately accessible to workers, and are more "portable" to wherever
the document goes. But Alfresco's discussion capability is more
appropriate if it's not just a conclusive comment but is likely to
turn into a conversation.
We're going to have to look into the question of setting-up an RSS
feed from Alfresco (and maybe a status page akin to what you have with
Pootle), so that work information is easily accessible outside the
site or without logging in. I'll follow up on that this week.
David Nelson
Thanks, guys! Quite a few of the comments are about screenshots needing replacement (I'm on Win7
with no Linux access); some are about capability/feature problems where I couldn't successfully
follow the procedures (I've submitted a couple of bugs, one more coming so far); others are more
along the lines of "Is this worth changing?" (screenshots that incidentally use OOo, like the
bibliography example that shows an OOo book, etc.).
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.