Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi :)

I think David and all have got Alfresco organised very well already and are 
quite quick to respond if things need doing.

At this point i think we need to move over to alfresco en-masse to see if anyone 
has any minor glitches with it as they work.  I think that is the fastest way to 
completing our first published result too.

Plenty of people have been beta-testing our implementation of Alfresco and it's 
ready for general use.  Hanging back would create problems now imo.  Heck, even 
i have used it successfully!

Regards from
Tom :)

From: Ron Faile <>
Sent: Sat, 29 January, 2011 2:06:27
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Draft Writer Guide files on the wiki

On 1/27/2011 11:49 PM, Hal Parker wrote:
I was under the impression (which could well be wrong) that the working
files for Writer are now the ones in Alfresco, and the Alfresco files are
not being copied to the wiki (at least not until publication).

If the Writer Guide files on the wiki are indeed not being updated from the
Alfresco files, it seems to me that we should remove the list of them (or at
least the links to the files themselves) from the wiki. Or just hide them,
or do something to discourage distressed readers from sending us corrections
to things we've already dealt with.

I notice that the Documentation/Development page has been amended to refer
to work being done on Alfresco.


Hi Hal, all

I disagree. I think the Getting Started guide chapters are well enough along to 
be considered almost final for a first release. They just need to be reviewed by 
someone before being considered final for 3.3. If we remove the Writer Guide 
files, what are the users going to read if they need some documentation? 
Especially since 3.3 was just released and many people will be visiting the 
site. They need to be able to download something, even if it's not finished. The 
wiki is a working space as well, in every area of the project.

I also thought that the documentation development page for working files should 
not have been deleted so quickly. Alfresco is only in it's infantcy as far as 
implementation goes. It would have been nice to have kept it until things are 
more ironed out.

Just my opinion though.

-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.