On Thursday 30 of January 2020, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 30/01/2020 13:01, Luboš Luňák wrote:
On Thursday 30 of January 2020, Noel Grandin wrote:
Noting that Apple ships a modified version of Clang (ie. it's a branch
not a tag), so that might be a little trickier than expected.
Yes, I know, that's why I explicitly mentioned that. But LLVM offers
Clang download for Mac too, so possibly(?) this could be handled by
downloading the same Clang version for both Mac and Linux.
Then again, CI builds would ideally use a baseline toolchain.
True, but the Apple baseline toolchain cannot work on Linux, so this wouldn't
work with any kind of cross-compiling.
Given that we still have tinderbox Mac builds, I think a practical solution
could be upstream Clang builds for CI and tinderbox Apple Clang builds to
catch the differences (which should be hopefully rare if the used upstream
Clang is close enough to Apple Clang).
--
Luboš Luňák
l.lunak@collabora.com
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.