Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Yury,

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:53 AM Yury <yury.tarasievich@gmail.com> wrote:

When building the 6.3.4.2 from the released source archive on 64-bit linux,
there were two difficulties:

1) if configured with the '--with-export-validation' the build process
fails, as it seems like some rng schemas are expected to be in
subdirectories of the 'schema' subdirectory -- but those were empty in the
source archive and were not populated by the build (so I had to switch that
validation off);

Those are not part of the tarballs since 2016
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/plugins/gitiles/core/+/34dced99c33a97dab86c4538fa267ad4ad4fb41f%5E%21

2) binaries validation fails for the ELFs linking the 'suspicious
libpython3.7m.so.1.0'; like, why?? I had to add this SO to the
$globalwhitelist in the 'bin/check-elf-dynamic-objects'.

Because the epm based packaging is mostly/nearly exclusively used by
TDF to provide the baseline builds, and that acts as a safeguard to
not introduce unwanted runtime dependencies not guaranteed to be
available on baseline.

You can add additional entries by exporting
LO_ELFCHECK_WHITELIST=libintl.so.8 for example.

ciao
Christian

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.