Re: What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions?

LRN <lrn1986 -AT- gmail.com>
Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:24:14 +0300

On 28.10.2019 11:39, Miklos Vajna wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:27:56PM +0300, LRN <lrn1986@gmail.com> wrote:

This was presented in 2017 on FOSDEM[0]. I'd like to know if this is available yet.

[0]: https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/libreoffice_extensions/


I think the last take was that the cost of exposing the "dialogs are
powered by .ui files" implementation detail over the stable API would be
a larger cost than the benefit of having dynamic dialog layout for
extensions.


I see. Okay then, i'll try to make do without this feature.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Context

What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions? · LRN
- Re: What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions? · Miklos Vajna
  - Re: What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions? · LRN
    - Re: What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions? · Thorsten Behrens
      - Re: What's the status of using Glade .ui files in extensions? · Rob Barry

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.