On 07/07/19 17:06, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
For the reference: we have a bug report since 2011
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34002
and the corresponding openoffice bug report from 2002 is linked in the
ticket...
Which should be a good indication that the request is unreasonable.
I think you mean "impractical" :-(
How is it unreasonable for support guys to want to be able to debug
their lusers' documents?
How is it unreasonable for people like me to want to use a modern word
processor, but be able to use it in a manner that we are comfortable,
rather than be forced into a "one size fits all" extremely uncomfortable
fairy tale bed ...
I was serious when I suggested that Uwe's best case for fixing his
documents was to "save as plain text" and start again. Bit tricky if the
document is full of graphics and other stuff ...
Cheers,
Wol
Context
- Re: Reveal code, old macros convert them to LO (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.