On 26/05/2019 21:24, julien2412 wrote:
Taking a look to the new reports generated by Cppcheck, I noticed
"duplicateConditionalAssign" and specifically this code:
2028 // If comparing the entire font, or if checking before each
alteration
2029 // whether the value changes, remains relatively the same thing.
2030 // So possible one MakeUniqFont more in the font, but as a
result a quicker
2031 // abortion of the query, or one must each time check bChanged.
2032 if ( rFont == aPrevFont )
2033 rFont = aPrevFont; // => The same ImpPointer for
IsSameInstance
See
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/editeng/source/editeng/editdoc.cxx?r=40d25921#2028
From a quick look, this looks plausible (if the two fonts compare
equal, but have potentially different innards, make them share a single
set of innards).
Another similar place:
xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenvironment_nssimpl.cxx
800 if( xcert == nullptr ) {
801 xcert = nullptr ; <-- whereas in other parts of the
same file, we see a throw instruction
802 } else {
That was apparently nonsense, <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/73019>
"operator new doesn't return null anyway". Thanks for pointing it out.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.