Hi, The current practice is: if 'make check' passes (which is more or less enforced by Jenkins) and the change looks good to a reviewer, the change goes in. And then releases are based on time, so it's really rare that there are "blocker" bugs which would delay a release. The ideal for any new kind of testing (including accessibility) is that it's integrated into 'make check', and whatever those tests cover are not OK to be broken anytime. If the proposed a11y tests are part of make check, then it's easy to promise that they won't be broken; otherwise it's just a best effort thing without any guarantees. At least that's how I understood what Markus wrote, and I agree with that. Regards, Miklos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature