On 09.02.2019 22:19, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Julien,
On 04/02/2019 21:15, Julien Nabet wrote:
Well - since our patches are modifications to Firebird, which requires
all modifications to have IDPL licensing, then all our modifications
cannot be under a different license?
So - Mike is right; but I expect no problems here. We should contribute
to Firebird under their own license, respecting that. This may mean that
whomever wrote the patch / worked on it should contribute it up-stream
to Firebird, and/or give permission for that.
Hmm... I'm sorry for not being clear. My point was that since our
patches (in our tree) were changing Firebird, they *automatically*
follow Firebird license - or otherwise we couldn't have modified it. So
I meant that whatever LibreOffice licensing is, the patches in Firebird
External subdirectory are already license-compatible with upstream Firebird.
--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.