Hello,
it is confusing, when the most stable version does not compile, as it happened to me, and when this
is not going to
change.
I suggest recomending only versions, which either compile, or in case they don’t compile, they are
supposed to be
publically tweaked to compile.
Regards
Дилян
On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:03 +0000, Kaganski Mike wrote:
On 16.01.2019 14:49, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
Hello,
what I wanted to ask was, why does the LO-webpage recommend for enterprises end of life
products.
My understanding of the processes is, that there are usually a stable version, that is not
end-of-live, and a most
current version, at the same time. However there are gaps, when the webpage offers only one
version, that is not end of
life, without stating this clear.
6.0 *is* the stable version at the moment, that is rightfully
recommended now. EOL means only one thing: no more releases for this
branch are planned. This happens at the moment when the last release of
the branch comes out. The last release for 6.0 brought last portion of
the fixes; and at this moment, 6.0.7 is considered the most stable - and
for that reason, recommended; and at the same time, TDF won't release
any more patches to it - so it's EOLed. So do you suggest to only
recommend versions that don't have the last pack of fixes?
--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.