Re: Implementing accessibility non-regression check tool

Miklos Vajna <vmiklos -AT- collabora.co.uk>
Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:14:29 +0100

Hi Eike,

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:27:43PM +0100, Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com> wrote:

The initial reason (correct if I'm wrong) was that the checker could be
used standalone and work on any glade .ui file, not even related to
LibreOffice, and thus be used by any project to raise a11y awareness.


Sure, makes sense, I'm fine if the checker doesn't use the same XML
parsing infra as our file format imports, just wanted to point out what
would be probably the best from our maintenance point of view.

Again, not suggesting a rewrite at this point. :-)

Regards,

Miklos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Context

Re: Implementing accessibility non-regression check tool (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.