Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2018 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 17.02.2018 07:54, Noel Grandin wrote:
at the very least we should make that wait command use a timeout, and fail the test, rather than hanging indefinitely​

As long as its unclear what the underlying problem is, what benefit does it have to add a timeout failure path in the test? Without the added timeout, a local failed test will be ready to be inspected (and moggi now gave suggestions what exactly to inspect in another mail in this thread). And failed tests on the tinderboxes will eventually time out either way.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.