Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2017 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 19:26 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Hi,

Consider:

enum t {a, b};

OUString f(t i)
{
  switch(i)
  {
  case t::a;
    return "it was an a";
  case t::b;
    return "it was a b";
  }
}


gcc -Werror fails with
error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]

But that is not true; since all possible values are treated and
return, it cannot fall through. How do I silence that spurious
warning-turned-error?

Seems that the "unhandled enum" stuff is working ok while the "end of
non-void function" isn't working, so....

enum class t {a, b};

OUString f(t i) 
{
  OUString ret;
  switch(i)
  { 
    case t::a:
        ret = "it was an a";
    case t::b:
        ret = "it was a b";
  }
  return ret;
}

would not have the return warning, but removing the case t::b: will
give a (desirable) enumeration value ‘b’ not handled

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.