On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 23:42 GMT, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:02:30PM +0000, Tamas Zolnai wrote:
Hi Khaled,
I don’t think text width or height are that interesting, but they are
probably a good approximation, so I repurposed one of the existing VCL
tests to test this[1]. I tried testing also the text bounding rectangle
but it showed a 1 pixel difference on Mac, this should be fixed in [2].
Feel free to add more test cases that you think are worth having.
I noticed today that some of the Windows tinderboxes fails on the new
vcl test randomly. They fail on the text width check. This can
explain why chart test were failing on the same Windows tinderboxes.
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1488318182.31559
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1488315724.23850
That is weird! Any chance that these machines has a copy of DejaVu Sans
installed system wide that we might be picking instead of the bundled
one?
This change[1] might help showing the source of the difference that is
causing the failures.
Hi Khaled,
Did you see the current build failures?
Here are two failures:
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1488779385.27281
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&brief-log=1488782916.5676
Interestingly it's the same tinderbox which is sometimes happy with the test, sometimes fails with
75 and sometimes fails with 91 as text width.
Clearly we have some wierd behavior here.
Best Regards,
Tamás
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.