Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
To relay some stories from real life - there's _so_ much integration
with especially OpenOffice out there, coming from legacy systems, tons
of macro-ized applications, sometimes bespoke development with the
company simply selling, not developing anymore - that by the time
those deployments 'see' our unpublished API (and subsequent changes
thereof), it's gonna be much, much, much too late to do anything about
it.

As said in my reply to Michael already, this has little to do with the actual
decision making except for us to get a better information base.

Your statement and Michaels statement display the antipodes of these arguments
and I assume we will continue to have these discussion on the ESC on a
case-by-case base -- possibly just somewhat better informed now and then.

Orthogonally to the above, that's a really worthwhile idea. I was once
already kicking the idea of an API forum / mailing list / whatever
around; perhaps -- if properly seeded & tended -- the dev askbot
instance could be that?

see draft at: 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=Development%2FBudget2017&diff=140532&oldid=140527
(also mentions askbot already)

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.