Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:00:28AM -0700, Laurent BP <jumbo4444@yahoo.fr> wrote:
- Advantage : in case of error (function does not work anymore), message
will be clearer as it will show the name of the function. With actual
behavior, only the name of the test file is displayed, and each test file
contains many functions
- Drawback : this will create many test files (~100 if I'm not wrong), which
may increase time of each build with check

I assume even 100 files will not take much time to test. This would also
have the benefit that when a test fails, you can know what is to code to
debug. (Closer to a real unit test, instead of the current
integration-like test.)

Do you think there are more advantages than drawbacks? If yes, I'm ready to
add these functions, but I want first to know if there is some benefit.

I think this would be a great improvement.

Regards,

Miklos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.