In https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97193 its
reported that the insertion of some vals into the InsCellCmd enum in
f97beeef352fdd9fd4f157a7a4c4f6af8341cbe6 of...
- INS_INSROWS,
- INS_INSCOLS,
+ INS_INSROWS_BEFORE,
+ INS_INSROWS_AFTER,
+ INS_INSCOLS_BEFORE,
+ INS_INSCOLS_AFTER,
caused recorded macros to break/change behaviour in 5.1.0 because the
messy macro recorder stuff can only record the number passed around.
It's trivial to change this so that the old ones go back to their old
original values, i.e.
INS_INSROWS_BEFORE,
- INS_INSROWS_AFTER,
INS_INSCOLS_BEFORE,
+ INS_INSROWS_AFTER,
INS_INSCOLS_AFTER,
INS_NONE
But of course anything recorded in 5.1 would then break in any version
with this change.
Should we put these vals back to their historical value or accept the
new values as locked in now ?
C.
Context
- calc InsCellCmd enum 5.1.0 change · Caolán McNamara
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.