Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Milos Sramek wrote:

The problem is demonstrated by the attached files, which show pixel
overlays of documents rendered in LO a MSOffice. There are some
differences visible also in the 'good' file, but these are much bigger
in the 'bad' one where they lead to different wrapping in the second
paragraph.

The files shows also another problem, different line spacing. This was
perhaps inherited from OOO.

The problem is perhaps not that important for users, but for my testing
it is a blocker

So there are two issue here, different line spacing (which shows up in
both versions) and different character spacing.

Unless you are specifically testing the line spacing, you can use fixed
line spacing to work around the first issue by avoiding the automatic
line spacing which depends on font metrics that are often interpreted
differently. I’m pretty sure LibreOffice is using the right font
metrics, but MS Office might be using the wrong ones (which is often the
case with old Windows applications) for backward compatibility. If you
can provide a test document and the specific fonts used I can give it a
look and see what is the possible source of difference.

Different character spacing can possibly be a kerning issue, this can be
tests by using a long string of characters with no kerning (aaaa's or iiii's
etc., but it depends on the font) and see if we still get differences.

Regards,
Khaled

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.