Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 04/29/2016 06:52 PM, Matteo Casalin wrote:
Hi everybody,
     I submitted to gerrit a one-line fix for bug 98940, a regression introduced by a previous 
commit of mine.
I think it's quite safe to push it to master, and I will do that in a few days unless someone 
reviews/pushes it in the meantime.

The aforementioned bug, however, affects the 5.1 branch and should be evaluated for backporting: 
what is the best approach to be followed for this?

Thanks in advance and kind regards
Matteo


As an addition, the bug reporter originally asked for two fixes:

1. allow again -1 as a valid value, that should be fixed by my patch at:
   https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/24268/

2. allow a maximum "maximum length" positive value higher than 32767. I
   see two issues with this:
   * that value is set by VCLXMultilineEdit::setProperty, that uses a
     sal_Int16:


http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/svtools/source/uno/unoiface.cxx#443

     and I have no idea if this can be changed or if it is stable api
   * The control widget can takes values higher than the aforementioned
     32767, and this besides being misleading can also be a source of
     undesired behavior (is the chosen value truncated, saturated or
     what?).

Any comment is much appreciated.

Kind regards
Matteo

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.