Hello, I've written a proposal based on the idea "attaching animations to styles" . I've attached the file with this email. Please provide a feedback on how it can be improved or what things are lacking in it. I would really appreciate if someone could guide me whether i headed in the right direction or not.I haven't contacted the proposed mentor personally and these are my insights on the idea. Regards, Rohan Kumar On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:30 PM, <libreoffice-request@lists.freedesktop.org> wrote:
Send LibreOffice mailing list submissions to libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to libreoffice-request@lists.freedesktop.org You can reach the person managing the list at libreoffice-owner@lists.freedesktop.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of LibreOffice digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Difficulty in cloning libreoffice (Bjoern Michaelsen) 2. TAGS for emacs (Pranav Kant) 3. Re: Build error (jan iversen) 4. Re: Build error (Mayank Gupta) 5. memory leaks around Application::PostUserEvent (Markus Mohrhard) 6. Re: Lode and Chocolate. (Norbert Thiebaud) 7. Re: Build error (jan iversen) 8. Re: Build error (Mayank Gupta) 9. Re: Proposal for using std::unique_ptr to signal transfer of ownership (Thorsten Behrens) 10. CppCheck Report Update (cppcheck.libreoffice@gmail.com) 11. Re: Build error (Tor Lillqvist) 12. Re: Build error (Mayank Gupta) 13. Build error (krishna keshav) 14. Mohamed Thabet license statement (Mohamed Thabet) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:19:59 +0100 From: "Bjoern Michaelsen" <bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> To: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> Cc: gaurav sharma <gauravsharma.gspt@gmail.com>, LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Difficulty in cloning libreoffice Message-ID: <20160312131959.GA18040@uzi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:07:51AM +0100, jan iversen wrote:Not really. I assume you follow: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved For linux the clone command is: git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core libreofficeFWIW, as fallback these mirrors exist: https://github.com/LibreOffice/core.git https://git.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice Best, Bjoern ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 19:37:53 +0530 From: Pranav Kant <pranav913@gmail.com> To: libreoffice-dev <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: TAGS for emacs Message-ID: < CAA9dPQ+rXPUWTgujDqTnmHq4YjCUvbK1aMnau2NW5DP+_ihw1Q@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" While looking for compatible TAGS file for emacs, I found we have a 'make etags' that is supposed to generates emacs compatible tags file. But this doesn't seem to work, atleast on my fedora box (because the `etags' binary on my system is different and doesn't accept some flags that solenv/bin/create-tags script gives it to, such as --langmap) ctags documentation says, to generate tags in emacs format one either needs to pass -e flag to binary or alternatively "if ctags is invoked by a name containing the string "etags" (either by renaming, or creating a link to, the executable), etags mode will be enabled." Shouldn't it be like this : --- a/solenv/bin/create-tags +++ b/solenv/bin/create-tags @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ctags=ctags if test "$1" = "-e"; then - ctags=etags + ctags="ctags -e" fi to make it work properly ? (unless people have separate `etags' file symbolically linked to ctags binary, which doesn't seem default on most systems). Or is there something I missed here ? -- Regards, Pranav Kant http://pranavk.me -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/87967ac4/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:43:14 +0100 From: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> To: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: <8297F076-4A8C-40E8-8E47-7BB8CF47FB7E@documentfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"On 12 Mar 2016, at 10:16, Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, I'm Mayank Gupta. GSoC 2016 aspirant for Libreoffice project 'Addimpress shape animations that use real physics engine'. I built Libreoffice on Windows it was successful with errors related to different tests. So, mst_ on IRC told it might be because ATL hadn't been disabled properly. He told me how to handle it and so I made a patch and uploaded to Gerrit. When I built it in visual Studio. Run impress from LO, added animations to a simple text in impress, an error popped up saying 'bad allocation'. I checked RAM usage it peaked to 72%(total 4 gigs RAM) with about 750 MB occupied by Libreoffice just before failure. Then I did a 'make clean' and did 'make' again on source directory. Building visual Studio solution was successful without error. My problems are:1) when I run Libreoffice from cygwin terminal it shows error: The application cannot be started. A General error occurred while accessing your Central configuration. ( "com.sun.star.configuration.ReadWriteAccess of typecom.sun.star.configuration.XReadWriteAccess ")This worked on my win 8.1 installation.2) Opening visual Studio solution does nothing. What should I do to solve these problems?how did you get a visual studio solution ? rgds jan i_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/421c5588/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 21:21:06 +0530 From: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> To: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: <CACQWuGOUUzf=11syhQEUXYB3VDsAOxR= SJWcm_R7UrgiVc7HFA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" After changing the cygwin interface to source directory I ran: /opt/lo/bin/make vs2013-ide-integration As stated by the instructions on wiki 'BuildingOnWindows' document. PS: I've set up all the directories according to the instructions only and not my own to avoid any confusion for myself and for others to whom I ask my doubts. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/b1b1bc18/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:28:17 +0100 From: Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> To: libreoffice-dev <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: memory leaks around Application::PostUserEvent Message-ID: <CAEDdEt4Yoqx=RRo32zm= a2WLgZaYpTvUuefzNGhX_G0uQSfCaQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hey, so while looking through the calc memory leaks I have many leaks related to the return object of Application::PostUserEvent. The returned value is created with new but I see no clear ownership for the returned value. Does anyone known who should actually own that object? It seems to be passed around a lot and there is the RemoveUserEvent function but I did not see any code that actually deletes the object. Regards, Markus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/f0dc4ce3/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:40:16 -0600 From: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> To: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> Cc: libreoffice <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Lode and Chocolate. Message-ID: < CAFWMYEEiDnfYi9S4+4fHTCmp1yVQOppG8r3B+7HstGKnXFAvFg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 3:06 AM, jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> wrote:On 12 Mar 2016, at 09:52, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> wrote: On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:10 AM, jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> wrote:Hi. Just tried the new chocolate setup with lode, works very nicely. GOODWORK.It would be even nice if we got it integrated into the first lodeinstall script, or at least the script check for the prerequsites.lode is meant to be run as a non-admin, on purpose so that the cygwin installed is owned by the normal user.. which save the back and forth to install new packages or edit /etc or usr/ and in general it is a good thing to build with a regular user (just like on linux you should not build as root) chocolate, and the stuff it install need to be as 'admin' so that still would require two step... Still that can make things much nicer.. since lode could provide a chocolate wrapper that the user be instructed to run as admin....Interesting, when I read the instructions, I read thatinstall_cygwin.ps1 is run as admin no it does not say that.. it even says: "Note: The install is done with your own user account, without Administrator escalation. This means that there will be no Cygwin entries in the Start Menu and no shortcut on the Desktop." teh big fat warning should be higher. with: unless explicitely told otherwise, run as normal user not Admin or root.My thinking was to have the chocolate steps in install_cygwin.ps1 withour "defaults" and command line options to overwrite them. No. for multiple reason 1/ chocolate need Admin, install_cygwin does not 2/ user are likely to already have a VS installed... but not necessarily cygwin. so I would just make available 2 ps1 script... one to be run as admin that do the chocolaty thing and the exisitng install_cygwin one (to be run as regular user) we can also 'steal' the bootstrapping sequence of chocolate to bypass the script restrinction when you are admin (that would work for that part since it has to be run as admin.. but not for cygwin_install which should run as Normal user.... Note: I'm not very fond of the chocolaty bootstrap, which essentially download a script from the internet and run it as admin.. without the user gettign a chance to inspect it.... that is scary to me... your' mileage may vary.. but _I_ would fetch the script. look at it and _then_ maybe run it :-) ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 19:21:29 +0100 From: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> To: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: <06EE22E9-9462-487F-BE41-09543726DD5E@documentfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"On 12 Mar 2016, at 16:51, Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> wrote: After changing the cygwin interface to source directory I ran: /opt/lo/bin/make vs2013-ide-integration As stated by the instructions on wiki 'BuildingOnWindows' document. PS: I've set up all the directories according to the instructions onlyand not my own to avoid any confusion for myself and for others to whom I ask my doubts.Today we recommend using: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved That uses the lode development. The vs2013-ide-integration does not allow you to build LO. We have a GSoC project upcoming to remedy that. rgds jan i._______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/674444b7/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:59:41 +0530 From: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> To: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: <CACQWuGOPmpEty8MBVTd_UBZr50OTdT_tJc+tKSL+BFn= u3TMjg@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm sorry. Actually I was talking about partial build that VS does. Problem with using LODE is that it doesn't support source as tarball. It clones the repository again. I don't have very good internet here. And I did the build via regular make in cygwin. Should I run and autogen.sh and then 'make' again on fresh copy of source? On Mar 12, 2016 11:51 PM, "jan iversen" <jani@documentfoundation.org> wrote:On 12 Mar 2016, at 16:51, Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> wrote: After changing the cygwin interface to source directory I ran: /opt/lo/bin/make vs2013-ide-integration As stated by the instructions on wiki 'BuildingOnWindows' document. PS: I've set up all the directories according to the instructions onlyandnot my own to avoid any confusion for myself and for others to whom I ask my doubts. Today we recommend using: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved That uses the lode development. The vs2013-ide-integration does not allow you to build LO. We have a GSoC project upcoming to remedy that. rgds jan i. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/fc306645/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:52:10 +0100 From: Thorsten Behrens <thb@documentfoundation.org> To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Proposal for using std::unique_ptr to signal transfer of ownership Message-ID: <20160312225210.GH2719@thinkpad.thebehrens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Markus Mohrhard wrote:I hope that these are not really controversial [...]Not at all - to state the obvious (and not let the mail linger unanswered). Cheers, -- Thorsten -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 949 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160312/b6d90232/attachment-0001.sig------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:24:08 +0000 From: "cppcheck.libreoffice@gmail.com" <cppcheck.libreoffice@gmail.com> To: "libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org" <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: CppCheck Report Update Message-ID: <797853.069703223-sendEmail@vm140> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" A new cppcheck report is available at : http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/cppcheck_reports/master/ Note: The script generating this report was run at : 2016-13-03_02:24:08 with user buildslave at host vm140 as /home/buildslave/source/dev-tools/cppcheck/cppcheck-report.sh -s /home/buildslave/source/libo-core -c /home/buildslave/source/cppcheck -w /home/buildslave/tmp/www It can be found and improved here: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=dev-tools.git;a=blob;f=cppcheck/cppcheck-report.sh ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:02:45 +0200 From: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> To: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> Cc: libreoffice-dev <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: < CANGFS+_YupRoBro67m8i1hCGjaxu3JNNLJWiOfPekroD_5Ud+Q@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"2) Opening visual Studio solution does nothing.Which solution do you mean? The one in the 'windows' subdirectory? That is not supposed to do anything interesting. It is mostly a dummy project whose only purpose is to enable *starting* an already built LibreOffice in the Visual Studio debugger. --tml -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160313/c1b9ed6d/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:31:41 +0530 From: Mayank Gupta <techfreakworm@gmail.com> To: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi> Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Build error Message-ID: <CACQWuGPf=+6jP5FgxpzGtPEqhCLhHjo8SATVes45X3gb9q= kFA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The solution which is made after 'make vs2013-ide-integration' and exists in source folder. Perhaps that's because the compete build itself wasn't successful. I tried make clean, then make. Deleted source folder. Unzipped tarball again and did git checkout - f and git pull - r. Ran autogen.sh with all the parameters except I didn't disable ATL and activex. But still build fails with errors. http://pastebin.ca/3399442 On Mar 13, 2016 12:33 PM, "Tor Lillqvist" <tml@iki.fi> wrote:2) Opening visual Studio solution does nothing.Which solution do you mean? The one in the 'windows' subdirectory? Thatisnot supposed to do anything interesting. It is mostly a dummy projectwhoseonly purpose is to enable *starting* an already built LibreOffice in the Visual Studio debugger. --tml-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160313/4512462b/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 14:08:39 +0530 From: krishna keshav <princy.krishnakeshav@gmail.com> To: LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Build error Message-ID: < CAJg+Twyku5cHQq_vOCMVfxF1bxh8AB152wy8XYFeyQfwawpZfw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hello, I have trying to build libreoffice recently using make.However the build terminates after giving following error http://paste.ubuntu.com/15370838/ . I ran the commands stated on termination which resulted in nothing. Please help with how should I proceed now.I am using ubuntu 14.04LTS. Thanks, Krishna Keshav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160313/d3ea3cc8/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 11:31:25 +0200 From: Mohamed Thabet <thabetx@gmail.com> To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Mohamed Thabet license statement Message-ID: < CAL52PBwSzPPtrej3p4vKWswGRugmu3v5kePbynukJy7KW1iuWQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license. Mohamed Thabet -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: < https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20160313/09ccd0f8/attachment-0001.html------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ------------------------------ End of LibreOffice Digest, Vol 67, Issue 14 *******************************************
Attachment:
proposal.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text